Good question! Besides it's not like there are not already
[several rewrites of the same old BBS software](http://9ch.in/overscript/),
right?

If you have not checked it out, head over to [and play around with the
site](https://ralee.org). It's undergone a lot of changes regarding its design
philosophy since it's inception. To date, RAL is the piece of software which I
am the most proud to have written.

A little history: I first conceived to write RAL on
[October 16, 2017](https://prettyboytellem.com/writing/Screenshots/2017/10-16-2017.png)
after I finished a mid-term exam for a geometry
course at university. I'd sharpened my PHP and DB dschema design skills over
the Summer working on hooYa!, a booru-of-sorts. hooYa! was not that great, but
the ideas and practice it gave me pushed me in the right direction at least.

RAL started off as a real-time textboard. I was influenced by places like
Chakai and it's small community, which runs on the Doushio software suite, 
which itself is atrociously written in node.js
and hardly documented at all. I have experience setting up a Doushio instance
on NC State's imageboard at [https://howler.space]. Although I
hated the software, the real-time nature of the application enthralled me
and so I ventured to write a real-time BBS, RAL.

Originally RAL entertained an air which is familiar to imageboards. That is
to say, it had boards, threads, and replies. However (even without releasing
it publicy) I grew very tired of it, perhaps becuase of how familiar it was.
I recognized that this could draw and retain a sizable community if it was
ever released, however I just found every part of it very boring... I set
myself against this design and ditched that source tree.

RAL embraces the past. The markup produced by RAL is very simple and
valid HTML, almost redolent of hand-written HTML. Additionaly, the color
scheme, blocky layout, and text-based nature of RAL make it feel like it
was somewhere your dad would have shitposted in the early 90's.

On the opposite side, I use semantic elements where appropriate and practice
recomended HTML5 document design. Further, the source-code uses paradigms
which are fairly modern. This way, I feel as if RAL has strong roots in the
past while still maintaining a forward-looking vision.

I am continually upset with the direction of modern web practice. Oh look,
it's the same goddamn Bootstrap CSS template I've seen 1000 times before. And
why is this Javascript framework slowing my computer down? I hardly ever
read pages that are displayed like this.

As it has been said: [quote]
I'm so fuckin' sick and tired of the Photoshop.

Show me somethin' natural like afro on Richard Pryor.

Show me somethin' natural like ass with some stretch marks.
[/quote]

Show me beefy content, not all this slapped-together "modern" design.